i shall do a cliche quantitative analysis, albeit more succinct.
Average = SCIENCE and MATHEMATICAL research programme (or somewhere along the lines) student without Bio without 3rd Lang
HP = HUMANITIES programme student without Bio without 3rd Lang
SYLLABUS
Average = 7 Subjects (English, Higher Chinese, Math, Physics, Chem, IHC, IHE)
HP = 7 Subjects (English, Higher Chinese, Math, Physics, Chem, Lit, IH)
% of syllabus related to programme’s expertise fields
Average = 3/7 (Math, Physics, Chem)
HP = 2/7 (Lit, IH)
NUMBER OF GRADED SUBJECTS
Average = 8 Subjects (English, Higher Chinese, Math1, Math2, Physics, Chem, IHC, IHE)
HP = 10 Subjects (English, Higher Chinese, Math1, Math2, Physics, Chem, Lit, IH1, IH2)
%
Average = 4/8 (Math1, Math2, Physics, Chem)
HP = 3/10 (Lit, IH1, IH2)
After comparing two different programmes, let’s compare within HP itself.
English, Higher Chinese, Math, Physics, Chem, Lit, IH
Humanities = 2/7
Sciences = 3/7
And given the tendency that HP students will do well in humanities and SMRP students and math and sciences, we can only conclude that the system is SCREWED UP.
and we do hrp, (or we try to do), and on top of that project we must do another for project’s day or our high and mighty DC will be angry with us. and cao will say it is our fault, even though we’ve shown the clear differences between us and others.
why have i never heard an apology from an adult before?
and all this, is not even including bio, a science subject, that half the class takes.